Foreign applicants & international law firms

U.S. trademark counsel for foreign applicants and international law firms.

Filing or maintaining a U.S. trademark from outside the United States requires a licensed U.S. attorney. John works directly with foreign brand owners and serves as U.S. counsel for international law firms who need a reliable point of contact before the USPTO.

Who must retain U.S. counsel

The USPTO requires that any trademark applicant, registrant, or party to a proceeding whose domicile is outside the United States be represented by an attorney who is licensed to practice law in the United States. This is generally referred to as the U.S.-counsel rule. It applies to a direct U.S. application filed from abroad, to a request for extension of protection into the United States under the Madrid Protocol, and to most post-registration filings for a foreign-domiciled owner. Foreign associates and in-house counsel often have deep trademark experience in their own jurisdictions but are not authorized to represent a client directly before the USPTO, that is where U.S. counsel comes in.

Madrid Protocol provisional refusals

A request for extension of protection into the United States under the Madrid Protocol is examined by the USPTO much like a direct application. If the examining attorney identifies an issue, a likelihood-of-confusion concern, a description problem, a missing declaration, the USPTO issues a provisional refusal. Responding requires U.S. counsel; the international registration and the WIPO filing alone do not authorize a response to USPTO examination.

Section 44 applications

A foreign applicant may also file a direct U.S. application relying on Section 44 of the Trademark Act, using an existing home-country registration or a pending home-country application as the basis for the U.S. filing, sometimes combined with an actual-use basis. Section 44 filings still go through USPTO examination and still require a U.S.-licensed attorney of record.

Office Actions

Whether the underlying filing is a direct U.S. application, a Madrid Protocol extension, or a Section 44 application, an Office Action from the USPTO requires a timely, substantive response from U.S. counsel. John reviews the refusal, explains the issue in plain language for the foreign associate or client, and prepares and files the response.

Statements of Use

When a U.S. application proceeds on an intent-to-use basis, a Statement of Use (or a request to extend the deadline) must eventually be filed to show the mark is actually being used in U.S. commerce. This step often requires close coordination with the foreign client to confirm U.S. use has begun and to gather an acceptable specimen.

Maintenance filings

Once registered, a U.S. registration owned by a foreign-domiciled party is subject to the same Section 8 and Section 9 maintenance and renewal requirements as a domestically owned registration, and still requires a U.S.-licensed attorney to sign and file those declarations.

Assignment and ownership updates

Corporate reorganizations, mergers, and assignments involving a foreign-owned U.S. registration need to be reflected in the USPTO record. John coordinates recordation of the assignment and confirms the registration reflects the correct current owner.

Foreign associate inquiry

Send the basics and John will follow up.

For law firms, in-house counsel, and foreign associates who need U.S. trademark counsel for a client matter.

Accepted formats: PDF, DOC, DOCX, JPG, PNG. Maximum 10 MB. Please do not upload Social Security numbers, payment information, medical records, or other highly sensitive personal information.
Book a free 15-minute fit call

A reliable point of contact before the USPTO.

Whether you represent the applicant directly or are a foreign associate seeking U.S. counsel, John will explain the next step and provide a written flat-fee quote before work begins.